Developing strategies and tools for resilient and sustainable buildings and cities.

๐Ÿ“ฝ๏ธ [Video] How to Deal with Manuscript Rejection

๐Ÿ“ฝ๏ธ [Video] How to Deal with Manuscript Rejection

Most PhD students and early-career researchers experience it sooner or later. A carefully written manuscript. Months of work. And then the email arrives:

โ€œWe regret to inform youโ€ฆโ€

Here is the uncomfortable reality of academic publishing: ๐Ÿ‘‰ In many leading journals, rejection rates exceed 80%. ๐Ÿ‘‰ A large share of manuscripts are rejected at the desk screening stage, before peer review. ๐Ÿ‘‰ Even strong papers are often rejected because of scope mismatch, editorial priorities, or positioning.

Yet almost no one explains how to respond strategically after rejection. Many researchers interpret rejection as a verdict on their research quality. In reality, it is often a signal about positioning, journal fit, or framing. In this video, I explain how to analyze rejection decisions and turn them into a structured resubmission strategy.

๐ŸŽฅ Watch the video: ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://lnkd.in/dSdkU_fq

What many researchers misunderstand about rejectionโ€ข Desk rejection usually reflects scope, novelty positioning, or editorial constraints โ€” not necessarily weak research.โ€ข Reviewer rejection often contains the most valuable feedback you will ever receive.โ€ข Editors read rejection responses strategically. Emotional reactions waste time.โ€ข Repositioning the manuscript for a different journal is often more effective than endless revisions.

๐ŸŽฏ What this video explains

This episode breaks down the real mechanics of manuscript rejection. You will learn:โ€ข why rejection is a normal structural feature of publishing โ€ข how to distinguish desk rejection vs. reviewer rejection โ€ข how to analyze reviewer reports strategically โ€ข how to build a structured resubmission process โ€ข how to develop the resilience required for long-term publishing.

Rejection is not the end of a paper. It is often the first step toward the journal where the paper actually belongs. This video is designed for PhD candidates, postdocs, and early-career academics who want to approach publishing analytically rather than emotionally.

๐Ÿ“š Part of the playlist: Reviewers & Editors: Roles and Responsibilities

๐Ÿ“ฝ๏ธ Watch the video: ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://lnkd.in/dSdkU_fq

๐Ÿ“š Learn more about our research https://www.sbd.uliege.be/

๐Ÿ’ป Subscribe to my newsletter https://lnkd.in/diTVT5eq

๐Ÿ…ฑ๏ธ Bilibili b23.tv/bzjL3bn or ๐ŸŽฌ YouTube https://lnkd.in/erHrfkNf

๐ŸŒ Explore previous posts and resources https://www.shadyattia.org

๐Ÿ”— Follow all my professional links, including WeChat ๐ŸŸฉ๐Ÿ’ฌ ๅพฎไฟก https://lnkd.in/eN3xZhhZ

๐Ÿ’ฌ If your manuscript was rejected recently, what helped you move forward?

#AcademicPublishing #PhDlife #EarlyCareerResearchers #PeerReview #ManuscriptRejection #ResearchStrategy #ScientificWriting #PostdocLife #PublishOrPerish #ResearchCareer

Subscribe to Shady Attia

Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
Jamie Larson
Subscribe