Developing strategies and tools for resilient and sustainable buildings and cities.

Reviewers & Editors: Roles and Responsibilities | New Video Series

Reviewers & Editors: Roles and Responsibilities | New Video Series

Academic publishing is not only about writing good papers. It is about understanding a system that filters, selects, rejects, and shapes more than 2.5 million peer-reviewed articles every year, with rejection rates above 90% in top-tier journals.

Today, I am launching a new video playlist: Reviewers & Editors: Roles & Responsibilities

This series provides a comprehensive, unfiltered introduction to how peer review and editorial decision-making actually work beyond author guidelines, checklists, and myths. Reviewers and editors are the gatekeepers of scientific integrity, quality, and credibility. At the same time, they operate under structural constraints: unpaid reviewing, time pressure, reviewer fatigue, commercial publishing models, and growing volumes of submissions.

Each time I start a new series, I wear a new tie. The color of this series is raspberry. 🍓 A small ritual, but a clear signal: this is a distinct, focused body of knowledge.

📽️ This first video covers

• Why reviewers and editors matter for scientific standards

• The scale and economics of the publishing industry

• Structural weaknesses of peer review and why quality varies

• Open science: ethics, costs, and strategic implications

• The changing position of researchers in a commercialized system

• Introduction to the full playlist and how to use it strategically

⏱️ Chapters

01:13 Why reviewers and editors matter

02:27 The publishing industry at scale

03:43 Structural challenges in peer review

05:27 Open science and its implications

07:04 Researchers in a commercial system

08:41 Introducing the playlist

10:27 Call to action

This is not a diagnostic series only. It is action-oriented.

Over the coming months, with one new video every month, the playlist will equip researchers to:

• select and interact with reviewers

• review papers rigorously and ethically

• respond strategically to reviewer comments

• handle rejection, desk rejection, and retraction

• understand the editor’s role and pathways to becoming an editor

This content is designed for early- to mid-career researchers who want to move from passive submission to informed navigation of the peer-review and editorial process.

The guiding principle is simple: Academic publishing is a strategic system. To succeed, researchers must think several steps ahead.

📽️ Watch the first video and access the playlist here: https://lnkd.in/ee98e9Be

📚 Learn more about our research: https://www.sbd.uliege.be/

💻 Subscribe to my newsletter: https://lnkd.in/diTVT5eq

🅱️ Bilibili b23.tv/bzjL3bn

🌐 Explore previous posts and resources: https://www.shadyattia.org b23.tv/bzjL3bn

🔗 Follow all my professional links, including WeChat🟩💬 微信: https://lnkd.in/eN3xZhhZ

#PeerReview #AcademicPublishing #Editors #Reviewers #ResearchIntegrity #OpenScience #EarlyCareerResearchers #PhDLife #Academia #SBDLab

Subscribe to Shady Attia

Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
Jamie Larson
Subscribe